[RMVHF] Possible solution

[Phil Krichbaum]

Jack,
    I'm glad someone else believes in the KISS principle! I've been 
lobbying for power classes (also QRP if possible) for multiops with ARRL 
and CQ for years and it doesn't seem to be anything the organizers or 
sponsors are interested in doing from either organization unless they 
believe it will increase entries.
    73 Phil N0KE

Jack K. wrote:
> Personally I favor less rules rather than more... why not have 3 
> classes...
>  
> Class 1 = single op power less than 150 watts.
> Class 2 = single open unlimited - as long as legal - power
> Class 3 = multi op power less than 150 watts
> Class 4 = Multi op power as in Class 2
>  
> Rover same as class 1 - 4 with the exception of signing /R and being 
> judged separately...
>  
> we keep making things more and more complex, I suggest that a good 
> deal of the frustration and abandonment of the contests is the "RULES" 
> Use the KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid) and don't worry the small stuff. 
> We need more players and less lawyers in this pastime...
>  
> DE KD1PE
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1596 - Release Date: 8/6/2008 4:55 PM
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rmvhf mailing list
> Rmvhf at rmvhf.org
> http://lists.rmvhf.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rmvhf
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.rmvhf.org/pipermail/rmvhf/attachments/20080806/e7dac724/attachment-0001.htm